بررسی رابطه‌ی هماهنگی کارکردهای بازاریابی بین المللی ـ منابع‌انسانی با اثربخشی اجرای استراتژی بازاریابی در شرکت‌های صادراتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه مدیریت دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و بازرگانی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت کسب و کار، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

3 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت کسب و کار (MBA)، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

10.22034/jiba.2018.7224

چکیده

افزایش عملکرد و کسب مزیت رقابتی بویژه در بازارهای متلاطم بین المللی توسط سازمان‌ها مستلزم اثربخشی اجرای استراتژی بازاریابی است. از طرف دیگر ایده‌ی هماهنگی و یکپارچگی، محور مفهوم مدیریت استراتژیک می‌باشد. با این وجود نقش روابط متقابل حوزه‌های کارکردی مختلف در اثربخشی اجرای استراتژی بازاریابی کمتر مطالعه شده است. از این رو در این تحقیق تلاش گردیده که با توجه به تئوری مدیریت استراتژیک فرضیه‌ی اصلی وجود رابطه میان هماهنگی کارکردهای بازاریابی بین المللی- منابع‌انسانی و اثربخشی اجرای استراتژی بازاریابی همراه با فرضیه‌های فرعی مربوطه آزمون شود. داده‌های مورد استفاده برای آزمون این فرضیه‌ها به‌وسیله‌ی پرسشنامه از 54 شرکت صادراتی گردآوری شده است. نتایج آزمون رگرسیون مرحله‌ای برای تحلیل داده‌ها، فرضیه‌های اصلی پژوهش مبنی بر وجود رابطه‌ی مثبت بین اثربخشی روابط و اثربخشی اجرای استراتژی بازاریابی و رابطه‌ی منفی بین تعارض میان‌کارکردی و اثربخشی اجرای استراتژی بازاریابی را تأیید می‌کند. نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش می­تواند مورد استفاده مدیران بنگاه­های تولیدی قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the relationship between coordination of international marketing-human resource functions with the effectiveness of marketing strategy implementation in export companies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Faryabi 1
  • Ali Rezazadeh 2
  • Saeid Bazmohammadi 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of economic and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
2 TA, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3 PhD Student at John Molson School of Business, CA.
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The process of strategic management requires many mutual interactions. Thus, effective collaboration is required between top executive management and managers of other functional departments in order to implement strategies successfully. The necessity of this coordination between the functions of international marketing and human resources is due to the different nature of their goals. Because the main responsibility of the marketing function is to meet the long-term needs of customers, while human resource department pursues providing performance-related benefits for employees (Chimhanzi, 2004; Chimhanzi & Morgan, 2005). In an effort to address these important objectives, each function is subjected to the pressure of other functions; therefore, more conflicts occur between them.
Although these concepts have largely been developed over the past three decades, little attention has been paid to the empirical investigation of interactions between marketing and other functional units, including human resources in the success of strategy implementation. Regarding this, in the present research, the coordination of international marketing-human resource functions with the effectiveness of marketing strategy implementation in the context of export companies is examined.
Placement of organizations in turbulent and uncertain environments necessitates the effective implementation and development of inter-functional coordination among different parts of an organization (Mohsen & Eng, 2016). On the other hand, market-oriented firms’ success relies on the coordination between various sectors, and this coordination is necessary to meet the market demands and promote marketing performance (Mohsen & Eng, 2016). Giannakis and Harker (2014) demonstrated the necessity of the alignment of HRM policies with relationship marketing in order to achieve organizational goals. Recently, researches by Chimhangzi and Morgan have been carried out on the necessity of the coordination between the functions of international marketing and human resources; they emphasized the need for coordination among these functions for the effectiveness of marketing strategy implementation grounded on Anderson's constituency-based theory of the firm (Chimhanzi & Morgan, 2005).
In this vein, the data were collected by distributing 54 questionnaires to export companies. Responses to questionnaire items were measured on five-point Likert scales where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. Stepwise regression analysis was utilized to investigate the causal relationships between independent and dependent variables.
Results provide support for the main hypotheses of the research that there is a positive relationship between the relationship effectiveness and the effectiveness of marketing strategy implementation and a negative relationship between the inter-functional conflict and the effectiveness of marketing strategy implementation.
 
Methods
The data were collected by distributing 54 questionnaires to export companies participating in non-oil export development conference held in Tabriz. Each questionnaire included 41 questions and responses to the items were measured on five-point Likert scales where 1 = ʻstrongly disagreeʼ and 5 = ʻstrongly agreeʼ.
Spearman's rank correlation test was used for bivariate analyses and to investigate the causal relationships between independent and dependent variables, stepwise regression analysis was implemented.
 
Findings and argument
Results revealed that joint reward system, senior management support and social orientation have positive and significant effect on relationship effectiveness. In addition, the negative and significant impact of mechanical structure, formal communications and social orientation on inter-functional conflict is supported.  
Results also demonstrated that the relationship effectiveness has positive and significant effect on marketing strategy implementation effectiveness; furthermore, inter-functional conflict affects significantly marketing strategy implementation effectiveness in a negative way.
Figure 1 shows a summary of the results. As outlined, the continuous lines represent supported hypotheses, while dash lines represent paths that have not been confirmed.
 





Relationship quality










Mechanical structure










Joint reward system










Senior management support










Formal communications










Social orientation










Relationship effectiveness










Inter-functional conflict










Marketing strategy implementation effectiveness





 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 1. Conceptual model demonstrating outcomes of stepwise regression analysis   
 
Conclusion and recommendations
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the international marketing-human resource functions with the effectiveness of marketing strategy implementation in the context of export companies. The main findings of the study confirmed the hypothesized relationships among the research variables. In this regard, according to the results of the regression tests, joint reward system had the strongest positive relationship with the relationship effectiveness, whereas the mechanical structure had the strongest negative relationship with inter-functional conflict. Also, among the five independent variables of the study, only social orientation affects both dimensions of relationship quality. Moreover, considering the results of the regression test in the third stage, it can be suggested that in order to achieve the effectiveness in marketing strategy implementation, creating effective relationships between different functions is of utmost importance; on the other hand, efforts should be made to reduce conflict between functional units. Overall, research findings confirm that firms are able to gain competitive advantage by coordinating international marketing- human resource functions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Inter-functional Coordination
  • Marketing Function
  • Human Resource Function
  • Marketing Strategy
  • Strategy Implementation
منابع
آرمسترانگ، مایکل (1384)، "مدیریت استراتژیک منابع انسانی: راهنمای عمل"، ترجمه سید محمد اعرابی و داود ایزدی، انتشارات دفتر پژوهش‌های فرهنگی، چاپ دوم.
اعرابی، سیدمحمد و رضوانی، حمیدرضا (1386)، "رابطه هماهنگی استراتژیک بین استراتژی سطح کسب و کار و استراتژی بازاریابی با عملکرد سازمانی: پژوهشی درباره شرکت‌های دارویی ایران"، علوم مدیریت ایران، سال 2، شماره 5، ص 97-71.
اعرابی، سیدمحمد و مقدم، علیرضا (1386)، "هماهنگ کردن استراتژی منابع‌انسانی با استراتژی تجاری و فرهنگ سازمانی"، علوم مدیریت ایران، سال 2، شماره 8، صص135-103.
افجه، سید علی اکبر و سپهوند، رضا (1386)، "اثر هماهنگی استراتژیک بین استراتژی منابع انسانی، استراتژی سرمایه انسانی و استراتژی رفتار سازمانی بر عملکرد سازمان"، مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی، سال 6، شماره 15، ص113-87.
باقری، زهرا و صفایی، ناصر (1395)، "برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی منابع انسانی بر مبنای الگوی BSC"، پژوهش‌های مدیریت منابع انسانی، سال 9، شماره 3، ص181-159.
رحمان سرشت، حسین (1377)، "نظریه‌های سازمان و مدیریت از نوین‌گرایی تا پسانوین‌گرایی"، جلد اول، نشر دوران، چاپ اول.
رحمان سرشت، حسین؛ صنوبر، ناصر (1382)، بررسی رابطه راهبردهای بازار- محصول و عملکرد صادرکنندگان ایرانی، مطالعات مدیریت، شماره 39 و 40 ، ص 98-69.
عباسی، عباس؛ مصلح شیرازی، علی نقی؛ حسینی، فرشته (1396). "تدوین راهبرد منابع انسانی در هماهنگی با راهبرد کسب و کار، فرهنگ و ساختار سازمانی. پژوهش­های مدیریت منابع انسانی، سال 9، شماره 2، ص 151-175.
فیاضی، مرجان؛ اعرابی، سید محمد (1393)، "الگوی هماهنگی استراتژی منابع انسانی با عناصر سازمان و تأثیر آن بر بهبود عملکرد"، پژوهش های مدیریت انتظامی، سال 9، شماره 2، ص 286-261.
مقیمی، سید محمد (1386) "سازمان و مدیریت: رویکردی پژوهشی"، انتشارات ترمه، چاپ پنجم.
ممدوحی، امیررضا و سید هاشمی، محمدرضا (1386). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی موانع اجرای استراتژی‌های بازاریابی بر اساس یک طبقه‌بندی مفهومی: مطالعه موردی شرکت ایران خودرو"، ارائه شده در دومین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت بازاریابی.
Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Top management team diversity and innovativeness: The moderating role of interfunctional coordination. Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 249–261.
Chari, S., Balabanis, G., Robson, M. J., & Slater, S. (2017). Alignments and misalignments of realized marketing strategies with administrative systems: Performance implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 63 (Supplement C), 129-144.
Chimhanzi, J. & Morgan, R.E. (2005). ­Explanations from the marketing/human resources dyad for marketing strategy implementation effectiveness in service firms. Journal of Business Research, 58, 787–796.
Chimhanzi, J. (2004). The impact of marketing/HR interactions on marketing strategy implementation. European Journal of Marketing, 38, 73-98.
Crittenden, V.L., Crittenden, W.F. (2008). Building a capable organization: The eight levers of strategy implementation. Business Horizons, 51, 301-309.
Eng, T.Y., (2006). An investigation into the mediating role of cross-functional coordination on the linkage between organizational norms and SCM performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 762–773.
Fisher, R.J., Maltz, E., & Jaworski, B.J. (1997). Enhancing communication between marketing and engineering: The moderating role of relative functional identification”. Journal of Marketing, 61 (3): 54–70.
Garcia, N., Sanzo, M.J., & Trespalacios, J.A. (2008). New product internal performance and market performance: Evidence from Spanish firms regarding the role of trust, interfunctional integration, and innovation type Technovation, 28, 713–725.
Giannakis, D., & Harker, M. J. (2014). Strategic alignment between relationship marketing and human resource management in financial services organizations. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22 (5): 396-419.
Griffin, A., & Hauser, J.R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(3): 191−215.
Gupta, A.K., Raj, S.P., & Wilemon, D. (1986). A model for studying R&D– Marketing interface in the product innovation process. Journal of Marketing, 50 (2): 7–17.
Hughes, D. E., Le Bon, J., & Malshe, A. (2012). The Marketing–Sales Interface at the Interface: Creating Market-Based Capabilities through Organizational Synergy. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 32(1): 57-72.
Hutt, M.D., & Speh, T.W., (1984). The marketing strategy center: diagnosing the industrial marketer’s interdisciplinary role. Journal of Marketing, 48 (4): 53–61.
Hutt, M.D., (1995). Cross-functional working relationships in marketing. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 23(4): 351– 358.
Johnson, J. S., Matthes, J. M., & Friend, S. B. (2017). Interfacing and customer-facing: Sales and marketing selling centers. Industrial Marketing Management. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.011
Kahn, K.B., & Mentzer, J.T. (1994). Norms that distinguish between marketing and manufacturing. Journal of Business Research, 30, 111-118.
Kohli, A., & Jaworski, B.J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2): 1–18.
Lascu, D.-N., Manrai, L. A., Manrai, A. K., & Kleczek, R. (2006). Interfunctional dynamics and firm performance: A comparison between firms in Poland and the United States”. International Business Review, 15 (6): 641-659.
Le Meunier-FitzHugh, K., Massey, G. R., & Piercy, N. F. (2011). The impact of aligned rewards and senior manager attitudes on conflict and collaboration between sales and marketing”. Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (7): 1161-1171.
Malshe, A., & Al-Khatib, J. A. (2017). A Repertoire of Marketers' Trust-Building Strategies within the Sales-Marketing Interface. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 37 (3): 213-227.
Malshe, A., Friend, S. B., Al-Khatib, J., Al-Habib, M. I., & Al-Torkistani, H. M. (2017). Strategic and operational alignment of sales-marketing interfaces: Dual paths within an SME configuration. Industrial Marketing Management, 66 (Supplement C), 145-158.
Malshe, A., Johnson, J. S., & Viio, P. (2017). “Understanding the sales-marketing interface dysfunction experience in business-to-business firms: A matter of perspective”. Industrial Marketing Management, 63 (Supplement C), 145-157.
Maltz, E., & Kohli, A. (2000). Reducing marketing’s conflict with other functions: The differential effects of integrating mechanisms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (4): 479–493.
Menon, A., Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1997). Product quality: Impact of interdepartmental interactions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (3): 187–200.
Mohsen, K., & Eng, T.-Y. (2016). the antecedents of cross-functional coordination and their implications for marketing adaptiveness. Journal of Business Research, 69 (12(: 5946-5955.
Narver, J.C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). “The effect of a market orientation on business profitability”. Journal of Marketing, 54 (4): 20–35.
Noble, Charles H., & Mokwa, Michael P. (1999). Implementing marketing strategies: Developing and testing a managerial theory. Journal of Marketing, 63 (4): 57−73.
Ruekert, R.W., & Walker Jr., O.C. (1987). Marketing’s interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 51, 1–19.
Shapiro, S.P. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 623– 658.
Singh, N., & Hu, C. (2008). Strategic alignment for Olympics in destination marketing: Extracting the tacit knowledge from the Athens 2004 Olympic Games. Tourism Management, 29 (5): 929-939.
Slater, S. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Olson, E. M. (2010). Factors influencing the relative importance of marketing strategy creativity and marketing strategy implementation effectiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 39 (4): 551-559.
Slater, S.F., & Narver, J.C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation–performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58 (1): 46–55.
Souder, W.E., Sherman, J.D. (1993), Organisational design and organisational development solutions to the problem of R&D– marketing integration, Research in Organisational Change and Development. (7): 181-215.
Srivastava, R.K., Shervani, T., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62 (January), 2–18.
Walker, O.C., Ruekert R.W. (1987). Marketing’s role in the implementation of business strategies: a critical review and conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing, 51, 15–33.