نگاشت رفتار و روش‌های فرصت‌شناسی کسب‌وکارهای کوچک و متوسط خارجی در ایران؛ مطالعه موردی فرانسه، آلمان، چین و ترکیه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دکترای مدیریت بازاریابی، دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکدۀ مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

10.22034/jiba.2019.8814

چکیده

بررسی روش‌های فرصت‌شناسی و ورود به بازارهای بین­المللی ازجمله مهم‌ترین زمینه­های پژوهشی در حوزۀ بازرگانی بین­الملل محسوب می­گردد که البته در رابطه با شرکتهای خارجی فعال در ایران کمتر مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. پرداختن به این موضوع به ویژه در شرایط بعد از توافقنامۀ برجام از اهمیت بیشتری برخوردار می‌شود. این مقاله درصدد است تا یک مطالعۀ موردی تطبیقی میان روش‌های فرصت­شناسی شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط از چهار کشور برگزیده در ایران را به انجام برساند. به این منظور بعد از مرور مختصری روی ادبیات موضوع، شش سؤال کلیدی تحقیق تبیین شده و با یک رویکرد کیفی 44 مصاحبۀ نیمه ساختاریافته با مدیران و نمایندگان شرکت‌ها از کشورهای برگزیده انجام شده است. سپس  داده‌های گردآوری شده با استفاده است روش تحلیل تم آنالیز شده و تم­های اصلی در مصاحبه­ها استخراج و در ادامه با ترسیم پروفایل فرصت‌شناسی شرکتها به تفکیک هر کشور امکان مقابله و مقایسه میان الگوهای رفتاری شرکتها به تفکیک هر کشور و مؤلفه های آن فرآهم شده است. بر اساس نتایج تحقیق اغلب شرکت‌های مورد مطالعه فرایند فرصت­شناسی خود را با شرکت در نمایشگاه­ها و/یا اعزام هیأت­ به ایران آغاز کرده­اند لیکن برحسب 6 مؤلفه از جمله شرایط صنعتی شرکت و کشور میهمان، میزان قرابت فرهنگی و وضعیت شبکه­سازی مسیرهای متفاوتی را ادامه داده­اند. تحقیق پیش رو می‌تواند جهت تحلیل و آسیب­شناسی ابتکارات توسعۀ تجارت میان ایران و سایر کشورهای هدف تجاری مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Mapping opportunity recognition among foreign SMEs in Iran: The case of France, Germany, Chine and Turkey

نویسندگان [English]

  • Manouchehr Ansari 1
  • Ehsan Soltanifar 2
  • Hashem Agazadeh 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Phd Marketing, faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Teran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Investigating entry modes and methods of international companies are among common research topics in international business. However, this issue has been less noticed regarding international companies in Iran. Analyzing international companies' behaviors in Iran become more important mainly after nuclear agreement between Iran and world powers(P5+1) on 14 July 2015. This paper is aiming to do a cross-case analysis on entry modes of small and medium enterprises from four selected countries in Iran. In this regard first, we reviewed the literature and provided a primary framework in the form of 6 questions to map opportunity recognition and entry modes of foreign SMEs. Then, we conducted 44 semi-structured interviews, extracted main themes and constructed a set of tables and figures to compare foreign SMEs and map opportunity profiles divided by countries of origin. With regard to these comparisons and contrasting we found out 6 factors(including. home/host industrial structure, cultural closeness and networking conditions) that had determined different opportunity recognition behaviors among SMEs. Present research could be replicated by future researches for analyzing and developing trade with target countries.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • International Business
  • International Entrepreneurship
  • Entry Modes and Methods
  • Opportunity Recognition
  • Opportunity Recognition Mapping
  1. بدری، میرابوطالب،. (1394). آلمان بیشترین و ایتالیا بزرگ‌ترین هیات اعزامی به ایران، مصاحبه با معاون امور بازاریابی و تنظیم روابط سازمان توسعه تجارت ایران در تاریخ 11/10/1394 بازیابی از وبسایت www.tpo.ir در شهریور1395.

     

    Ajdari, P. Soltanifar, E. Ansari, M, (2016). Analyzing International Opportunity Recognition Profiles: The Case of Iran, Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development (JIBED), 9 (4): 379-397.

    Alon, I., Dana, L.P. and Jenkins, A. (2009). International business by SMEs: empirical findings from New Zealand’, Journal of International Business and Economy, 10 (2): 59–78.

    Anderson, S. and Evers, N. (2015). International opportunity recognition in international new ventures – a dynamic managerial capabilities perspective’, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 13 (3): 260–276.

    Arenius, P. and De Clercq, D. (2005). A network-based approach on opportunity recognition’, Small Business Economics, 24 (3): 249–265.

    Barringer, Bruce R. & Ireland, Duane (2008). Entrepreneurship: Successfully Launching New Ventures, Pearson/Prentice Hall, 543 pages

    Baron, R.A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: how entrepreneurs ‘connect the dots’ to identify new business opportunities’, Academy of Management Perspectives, February, 20 (1): 104–119.

    Baron, R.A. and Ensley, M.D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs, Management Science, 52 (9):1331–1344.

    1. Chandra, Y., Styles, C. and Wilkinson, I. (2009). The recognition of first time international entrepreneurial opportunities: evidence from firms in knowledge-based industries’, International Marketing Review, 26 (1): 30–61.

    Dana, L.P. (2000). Networks, internationalization & policy, Small Business Economics, 16 (2): 57–62.

    Etemad, H., Wright, R.W. and Dana, L.P. (2001). Symbiotic international business networks: collaboration between small and large firms’, Thunderbird International Business Review, July–August, 43 (4): 481–499.

    García-Cabrera, A.M. and García-Soto, M.G. (2009). A dynamic model of technology-based opportunity recognition’, Journal of Entrepreneurship, 18 (2): 167–190.

    George, N.M., Parida, V., Lahti, T. and Wincent, J. (2014). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors’, International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 12 (2): 1–42.

    Grégoire, D.A., Barr, P.S. and Shepherd, D.A. (2010). Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: the role of structural alignment, Organization Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.413–431.

    Griffin, R.W. and Pustay, M.W. (2013). International Business, 7th ed., Pearson, Essex.

    Hansen, D.J., Monllor, J. and Shrader, R.C. (2016). Identifying the elements of entrepreneurial opportunity constructs: recognizing what scholars are really examining’, The International

    Hansen, D.J., Monllor, J. and Shrader, R.C. (2016). Identifying the elements of entrepreneurial opportunity constructs: recognizing what scholars are really examining’, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 17 (4): 240–255.

    Jack, S., Moult, S., Anderson, A.R. and Dodd, S. (2010). An entrepreneurial network evolving: patterns of change’, International Small Business Journal, 28 (4): 315–337.

    Jones, M.V., Coviello, N. and Tang, Y.K. (2011). International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): a domain ontology and thematic analyses, Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (6): 632–659.

    Kontinen, T. and Ojala, A. (2011). International opportunity recognition among small and medium-sized family firms’, Journal of Small Business Management, 49 (3): 490–514.

    Laufs, K. and Schwens, C. (2014). Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises: a systematic review and future research agenda’, International Business Review, (23): 1109–1126.

    Lumpkin, G.T., Hills, G.E. and Shrader, R.C. (2004). Opportunity recognition’, in Welsch, H.P. (Ed.): Entrepreneurship: The Way Ahead, pp.73–90, Routledge, London.

    Macpherson, A., Jones, O. and Zhang, M. (2004). Evolution or revolution? Dynamic capabilities in a knowledge-dependent firm’, R&D Management, 34 (2): 161–177.

    Mikhnev, A. (2016). A Presentation Entitled; Building the Capacity of Business Membership Organizations, International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group [online] http://www.ifc.org/sme (accessed 2nd May 2016).

    Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded sourcebook 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, California, USA.

    Pech, R.J. and Cameron, A. (2006). An entrepreneurial decision process model describing opportunity recognition. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9 (1): 61–78.

    Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review. 26 (2): 243–264.

    Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research’, Academy of Management Review. 25 (1): 217–226.

    Sheng, S.Y. and Mullen, M.R. (2011). Hybrid model for export market opportunity analysis. International Marketing Review, 28 (2): 163–182.

    Wild, J.J. and Wild, K.L. (2012). International Business: The Challenges of Globalization, 6th ed., Pearson Education Limited, Thousand Oaks, California.

    World Bank Group (2016). the Handbook ‘Building the Capacity of Business Membership Organizations (BMOs): Guiding Principles for Project Managers, Small and Medium.